Daily Kos

Disturbing: 39% of Clinton supporters agree with Ferraro + Unrelated Bonus Crap

Thu Mar 13, 2008 at 09:06:57 PM PDT

Rasmussen's latest polling update in Pennsylvania finds something quite disturbing. I'll let whats under the fold speak for itself:

http://rasmussenreports.com/...

Comments by former Democratic Vice Presidential nominee Geraldine Ferraro have caused a stir nationally and 66% of Likely Democratic Primary Voters have been following the story at least somewhat closely. Ferraro recently told a newspaper that "if Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position." Clinton voters are fairly evenly divided on Ferraro’s comment—39% agree and 47% disagree. Obama voters overwhelmingly reject Ferraro’s premise—93% disagree with her statement while only 4% agree.
Sixty-two percent (62%) of Black voters believe Ferraro’s comments were racist. Just 23% of White voters agree.
Ferraro also said that Clinton was treated unfairly by a "sexist media." Fifty-seven percent (57%) of Clinton supporters agree with that statement while 26% disagree. Obama voters disagree by an 85% to 9% margin.

So the question to me is:
Is this a matter of partisan loyalty to a candidate - being in love so hard that they will drum up any apologetic excuse whatsoever? Or is this something more disturbing: That nearly half of Clinton's supporters are racist? I certainly hope not.

_________

BONUS ITEMS:

1. Obama gained a loudmouth today: Rosie O'Donnell is now in the Obama camp.

http://www.rosie.com/...

patty writes:

   Q:How can you support what Hillary has become? Can you not see and feel the yellow from Barack???

A:i am obama bound

( Rosie had been undecided in her Feb 4 Huffington Post article )

2. All this racism talk got you down? Lighten up! RACE WAR! WOO!

Poll

What drives Ferraro apologetics?

35%45 votes
8%11 votes
48%62 votes
7%9 votes

| 127 votes | Vote | Results

Tags: Ferraro, Clinton, Obama, racism (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

View Comments | 105 comments